Review: Illich on Deschooling society

Homeschool Legal Defense - Review: Illich on Deschooling society

Good evening. Now, I learned about Homeschool Legal Defense - Review: Illich on Deschooling society. Which could be very helpful to me and you. Review: Illich on Deschooling society

Before I read of Ivan Illich's death I had started to write a comment on his contributions and ideas of "Deschooling Society." I have felt that many homeschoolers and even many Illich fans miss the message he was trying to deliver. maybe my own interpretation is enhanced by the numerous opportunities I had to talk with him, hear his lectures, and visit with his "traveling crap game" that met in various universities colse to the globe. Or it may be that his way of developing an idea was to stimulate the listener's own thought, rather than to lay an idea out so clearly that every one captured exactly the same message. Now that Ivan has passed on I am driven to make this piece a bit longer than it was originally drafted.

What I said. It shouldn't be in conclusion that the actual about Homeschool Legal Defense. You see this article for facts about an individual want to know is Homeschool Legal Defense.

Homeschool Legal Defense

"Deschooling Society" was more about community than about schools. community needed deschooling because it was a mime of the school law that it engendered and that engendered it. In our current community individuals are startling to work in dull and stultifying jobs for future rewards. This they are trained to do in schools. They go to school so that they can get a job to work for future rewards.

By deschooling illich did not mean taking study into the home, nor did he mean "free schools" in which a curricula was set by the students. study of any kind that little a person's capacity and desire to self-learn was detrimental to the living a full life by that person.

All life, agreeing to Illich, should be "convivial." That is it should be lived in joyous collaboration with friends and colleagues. studying and work alike should be fun and fulfilling. They should be entered into as, and not differentiated from, play and recreation. A community that does not create that kind of convivial studying and living is not living up to, nor fulfilling the potential of, humanity.

In later works, like "Tools for Conviviality," and "Shadow Work," Illich developed added the theme of what he meant by living the good life. He took "good" in both of its connotations, -- good as moral, and good as a pleasing. "Vernacular" was the word Illich used to express the good life. The vernacular is the simple, the local, the communal. Every human and every community has its own natural idea of the vernacular. It is wrapped up in being a human. It is what a man can do themselves in the place the are at the time it is without dependence of external assistance.

The bike was the hardware example Illich often used to exemplify the vernacular. The bike extends one's own quality and efforts for transportation. It needs no heavy covering law beyond that its operator's control. The automobile, on the other hand, is not only a complicated apparatus requires a complicated covering system, but it also requires more work and exertion than it produces in transportation. If you take into list all the hours you spend to buy a car, to buy gas and tires, to pay taxes for the road, to insure and license it, to clean up its pollution, and pay for all of the other costs your rate of travel is less than that of a bicycle, and that doesn't count either the hours, the costs, or the disappointment spent in traffic jams and accidents.

In "Medical Nemesis" took the same idea to the healing law showing that not only did the healing not cure ills but in created them. In every aspects of our lives conviviality and the vernacular have been overwhelmed and diminished by what Illich called the "disabling professions." The law professions have increased crime, the expert economists have created scarcity and poverty, the teaching profession has dumbed us down, the farming profession has incrased hunger. With this loss of the vernacular has come the loss of the house and the community. The singular goal of humans has come to be to "make it" in a materialistic global economy.

In his most new essays Illich has brought his concepts to a fitting climax. An essay "The Cultivation of Conspiracy" in "The Challenge of Ivan Illich" a 2002 book of a collection of essays by many of his colleagues edited by Lee Honacki and Carl Mitcham. This essay discusses friendship. The friendship Illich writes of is not just that of being kind and cooperative to you neighbors. It is a deeper 'conspiriatio'. As in much of his writing Illich goes to great length to witness the traditional meaning and connected ideas and actions connected to the word. "Conspiriatio" is breathing together. But breathing is not merely expelling air. It is about the breath of life -- the soul. 'Conspiriatio' is the melding of one's inner being with others. It is best exemplified by the wedding kiss that symbolizes, or more exactly is, the combining of two souls. It is more than the ceremony or the license of marriage. It is above corporal love. It is the unifying of two beings. This conspiratio, or welding of souls, (although Illich, a old priest, doesn't us the word soul) is the root of the vernacular and of the convivial.

This brief postponement of Illich's concepts is meant only to put his book and the idea of deschooling community into context. Homeschooling grew from the ideas of Illich, Holt and others. during the 1970s a few scattered families broke away from government schools and started homeschooling. By 1980 there were some 10,000 to 20,000 such families homeschooling alone. As the numbers grew these scattered home schools started linking up, establishing organizations to supply resources, and to take on extra tasks like the legal defence of homeschooling. By 1990 the cells of homeschooler had come to be a soup and ad hoc linking became normal. "Homeschool withhold groups" spontaneously self-organized in many communities and on the Internet. By 2000 there was roughly no Ameican community that did not have a Homeschool withhold group.

But, in the practical day to day struggle to homeschool their own children many, if not most, homeschoolers left behind the public idealism of Illich and Holt. Parents who were imbued with the idea of study could not unmistakably let their children be free to learn whatever the community and nature offered them. They had been guided by their schools and parents and they believed it only natural to be the guides and authorities for their children. They looked to "experts" to supply school texts and curricula. And transfer data with other parents on how to keep their children's> noses to the books. Their universal cry is for government to "just leave us alone." They argued that they have "parental rights" to raise their children as they wish.

As homeschooling is becoming acceptable by the mainstream it is also finding again at it roots and recognizing that "homeschooling alone" is not enough. Conviviality and the vernacular are arising within the homeschool withhold groups. The goal of A Coalition for Self-Learning is to bring the idea of deschooling community into real being. We seen this transformation as being primary for the survival of humanity.

Bill Ellis

I hope you have new knowledge about Homeschool Legal Defense. Where you possibly can put to use in your day-to-day life. And most significantly, your reaction is passed about Homeschool Legal Defense.